Peer-Reviewed Study Shows Ivermectin Reduced Deaths by 74% !!!!!
Even worse, you probably think you couldn’t possibly be surprised by anything the CDC does anymore, no matter how silly or bereft of human intelligence, or dumber than a Martian rock. Well, you’d better sit down. The Epoch Times ran a story yesterday headlined, “CDC Quietly Removes COVID Vaccine Adverse Events Collection From Website.”
There are two adverse event collections systems. The first and more well-known is VAERS, an “antiquated” system that Branch Covidians love to dismiss out of hand because it is a “self-reporting” system and “anybody” can enter a report (under penalty of perjury and federal criminal prosecution if false, with cases only published after review by FDA officials, but still).
The second, newer system is called V-SAFE. It requires vaccinees to register using their mobile devices and then complete periodic surveys about their ongoing health. It is a long-term safety monitoring system.
About 10 million Americans who got the covid jabs signed up for V-SAFE.
Yesterday, the CDC unceremoniously pulled the plug on V-SAFE for covid, abruptly announcing a retroactive data cut-off of June 30th. It did not explain its baffling decision to terminate the highly-celebrated, high-tech program. According to the announcement, the CDC had also stealthily cut off any new registrations back on May 19th.
Wrapping it up.
For context, and for a possible explanation for canceling the program, since CDC isn’t saying, here are some V-SAFE stats. According to an analysis by ICAN, as of September 2022, the 10.1 million users had completed over 151 million monthly health surveys using the platform (about 15 each). Of the 10.1 million users, over one-third, 3.53 million people, reported being “adversely impacted” by their vaccination.
Of those adversely impacted, 1.2 million folks reported being “unable to conduct normal activities,” which sounds bad, and 1.3 million said they had to miss school or work. About 800,000 actually needed medical treatment for their “adverse impact.”
Between the two companies, Moderna registered 1.6 million adverse impacts, and Pfizer had 1.4 million.
Half (48.5%) of the people who needed medical care sought “urgent care,” and 15% had to visit emergency rooms. From the ICAN review:
 |
One of the most compelling arguments against the jabs from the outset was the absolute absence of any long-term safety data for a brand-new, never tested mRNA vaccine platform. For some reason, the CDC just pulled the plug on its newest, most-reliable system for obtaining long-term safety data.
The CDC did not respond to Epoch’s request for comment.
September 3, 2023 BREAKING NEWS: APPELLATE COURT JUDGES TO FDA: "WE ARE NOT CONVINCED."—The FLCCC News Capsule for September 3, 2023
A Compendium of the Latest COVID-19 News, Facts & Features FLCCC ALLIANCE
Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine (Cleveland Clinic Study) Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine protects against COVID-19. Results Among 51017 employees, COVID-19 occurred in 4424 (8.7%) during the study. In multivariable analysis, the bivalent vaccinated state was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 during the BA.4/5 dominant (HR, .71; 95% C.I., .63-.79) and the BQ dominant (HR, .80; 95% C.I., .69-.94) phases, but decreased risk was not found during the XBB dominant phase (HR, .96; 95% C.I., .82-.1.12). Estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) was 29% (95% C.I., 21%-37%), 20% (95% C.I., 6%-31%), and 4% (95% C.I., -12%-18%), during the BA.4/5, BQ, and XBB dominant phases, respectively. Risk of COVID-19 also increased with time since most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received.
VIRAL-GO-ROUND ☙ Sunday, September 17, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS 
Sunday bonus post! Nipah virus roundup [open]; CIA bribes own analysts to lie to Congress; 1st poll predicts Trump landslide; week of disasters roundup; Dr. Risch on turbo cancer; Paxton freed; more.
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Good morning, loyal C&C supporters! It’s Sunday. Your bonus roundup includes: a Nipah-virus roundup shows we may be back on the NIH’s viral merry-go-round again; CIA bribes its own analysts to lie about covid’s lab origins; first major poll to predict Trump landscape; many major disasters this week; Greek floods; Libya floods; earthquake in Morocco; Dr. Harvey Risch discusses turbo-cancers on American Thought Leaders; and in fantastic news, the attempted impeachment of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton went down in flames yesterday.
THE C&C ARMY POST
Due to the urgency and potential significance of today’s Nipah story, C&C is providing that part of today’s post to everyone.
WORLD NEWS AND COMMENTARY
You’re not going to believe this story, but here we go again. Just wait till you see all the connecting parts. We’ll begin with a Hindustan Times story that ran yesterday headlined, “Nipah virus: Health department tightens restrictions in Kerala.” Yep. They’re doing it again.
 |
Kerala is an urban political region in southwest India where 33 million people live. The Kerala region is subdivided into about 22,000 tiny ‘wards’, which are comparable to village or neighborhood councils. Wards typically contain between 5,000 and 20,000 people.
 |
Nipah virus is a relatively-new, high-fatality respiratory virus that first appeared in India back in 2001. It’s a nasty bug. It features a startling 40%-75% mortality rate, is rated for BSL-4, the highest biolab security requirement, and is a CDC designated “Bioterrorism Agent.” Articles describing the current two human deaths variously suggest a zoonotic (animal) origin for the virus either from pigs or, wait for it, fruit bats.
It reportedly spreads through body fluids.
Nipah virus is NOT airborne. Of course, that’s not stopping everybody in Kerala from maniacally wearing masks because, why would it? Masks can stop any kind of virus using their magical mask powers. You just have to make the right sacrifices to the mask gods, or something.
Two deaths is not an outbreak. The official alarm seems to stem from the fact that the second guy who died was contact traced to the first victim. The second guy ran into the first guy at the hospital, which strongly suggests human-to-human transmission. And that’s what has everyone so excited.
One case of human transmission.
In spite of the fact that all post-pandemic studies of lockdowns concluded lockdowns don’t work, and cause enormous unintended harms, the article reported that India’s health ministry has already declared 45 Kerala wards as a “containment zone” after discovering the two Nipah deaths. The containment order imposed a useless lockdown, restricting access to the 45 wards, shuttering schools, prohibiting public gatherings, nixing “non-essential” businesses, mandating masks, requiring testing and tracing, and setting a 5pm curfew.
It was not clear from the Hindustan Times article (or any of the other articles) how India’s ministry of health concluded that a lockdown was needed for a non-airborne virus. Apparently you don’t even need to explain it anymore.
In case you are germaphobically fretting over this new viral threat, don’t worry! Just last year in July, Moderna and Fauci’s NIAID started a clinical trial for a new mRNA vaccine for … the Nipah virus! What good luck!
 |
But wait, there’s more. Almost exactly two years ago, researchers published a study on arXiv concluding they’d found Indian-origin Nipah virus DNA in, get this, the five original covid-19 patients at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) lab.
 |
The researchers were astonished finding Nipah virus where it shouldn’t be, because it proved “that research at WIV was being conducted on an assembled infectious clone.” This was so astonishing because the BSL-3-rated Wuhan lab wasn’t supposed to be working on any BSL-4-level viruses:
Research involving Nipah [NiV] infectious clones has never been reported to have occurred at the WIV… [these findings] indicate that research at WIV was being conducted on an assembled NiV infectious clone. Contamination of patient sequencing reads by an infectious NiV clone of the highly pathogenic Bangladesh strain could indicate a significant breach of BSL-4 protocols. We call on WIV to explain the purpose of this research on infectious clones of Nipah Virus, the full chronology of this work, and to explain how and at what stage of sample preparation this contamination occurred.
I’ll give you two guesses. Which do you think happened: one, the Wuhan lab was immediately forced to explain why it was secretly experimenting on a dangerous potential bioweapon like Nipah, or two, everybody completely ignored this shocking 2021 study?
Yep. It was two. But the story didn’t completely die. One year later in 2022, Congress heard testimony that the Wuhan lab was experimenting on Nipah. Here’s the headline from the Washington Times’ August 9th, 2022 article:
 |
The article reported that a Senate subcommittee on emerging threats took testimony from a scientific witness, Dr. Steven Quay, who testified the Wuhan Institute of Virology was carrying out synthetic biology research on the Nipah virus genome in December 2019, right around the same time the first covid-19 cases surfaced in Wuhan.
Dr. Quay was blunt. He accused the WIV of bioengineering Nipha. He told Senators, “Nipah is a BSL-4 level pathogen and a CDC-designated bioterrorism agent. This is the most dangerous gain-of-function research I have ever encountered. We should assume this research continues to this day at the WIV.”
But it gets better. In 2021, around the same time Fauci’s NIAID started working with Moderna to trial a Nipah mRNA vaccine, Fauci also awarded a separate $2.3 million dollar grant to study the Nipah virus in bats, and guess who he awarded the grant to?
 |
Yep. Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, who at the time was up to his dirty, bioweapons money-laundering neck in the covid disaster. And … bats again. They love the bat viruses. Someday we’ll figure out why.
But wait… the story gets even better! Guess what particular medication that, in 2019, the NIH found was allegedly “completely protective” against Nipah? Hint: Fauci loves this medication. Yep. You guessed it. Run-death-is-near:
 |
Are you feeling the Dejá vu yet? Next, consider this: In May 2018, Johns Hopkins ran one of its now-infamous “tabletop exercise” planning sessions, this time using a bioengineered Nipah-Flu combo virus as the simulation’s subject.
The last line in the event’s description was the most chilling:
 |
As a lawyer, I would call it “real world evidence” that there’s a study and testimony proving the Wuhan lab — which used gain-of-function techniques to engineer the covid virus by making it more transmissible in humans — was (or is) also working on gain of function on the Nipah virus.
I’m telling you, these health bureaucrats and experts are going to get us all killed one of these days.
THE BOTTOM LINE
Wild-type Nipah is not a pandemic candidate, for two good reasons, First, it has a too-high fatality rate. People get too sick too fast for it to spread efficiently. Second and more important, Nipah isn’t airborne. Transmission requires physical contact, which means: no super-spreading.
It’s true that could change if a new weaponized version of the virus suddenly appears, but that hasn’t happened yet. India’s been dealing with small Nipah outbreaks like this for twenty years since 2001, and newspapers have been wrongly predicting Nipah pandemics all that time.
Based on what we know, it looks more like India is overreacting than anything else. If and when it looks like the usual suspects will try knitting Nipah into a pandemic, then I’ll offer suggestions for how we should respond. But, in yet another coincidence, I have seen at least one published study suggesting ivermectin is effective against the family of viruses that includes Nipah. You might want to order yourself a couple boxes.
For now, the real story is not India The real story is Wuhan: the Wuhan lab is experimenting with Nipah! That should be a four-alarm fire. And the NIH is funding it! Our representatives need to pull the plug for good on our uselessly-dangerous big health agencies, and we need to shut down that lab in Wuhan before something worse than covid happens...
Guidelines for COVID-19 Boosters September 13, 2023 (State of Florida)
Now we arrive at celebrity vaccine scientist Dr. Paul Offit, a central figure on the FDA’s vaccine advisory committee, the one that approved the jabs for kids without any debate. Call me naive, but I was actually reassured when Dr. Offit’s name first came up, back in the halcyon days of the early pandemic, back when I still believed the government had some idea it knew what it was doing.
 |
After all, I had read Dr. Offit’s book, “Pandora’s Lab: Seven Stories of Science Gone Wrong.” In the book, Offit described all kinds of horrible mistakes that science plus government has made over the years, such as by repeatedly approving successive generations of opioids for pain treatment, each one more destructive than the last. I figured if anyone understood the potential for the horrifying long-term risks inherent in hasty, politically-driven drug approvals, it would be Dr. Paul Offit.
He also has a calm, capable, grandfatherly way of explaining things that is soothing and very reassuring. For example, last year in this clip Dr. Offit explained to jab takers why they didn’t need to worry about any long-term side effects from the covid jabs:
We also know historically when you look at vaccines and you find safety problems — and certainly, there have been safety problems, severe safety problems associated with vaccines — they virtually always been found within two months of getting the vaccine, and now we have really two years worth of data. And I don’t think there are going to be any surprises at this point.
And that’s why it’s important to be vaccinated. Thank you.
See? Just wait two months and you’ll be fine. Or at least, that was 2022 science. Now it’s 2023, the Science™ is evolving. Yesterday, Dr. Offit published a new video clip, in which he explained his rationale for not getting the new and improved booster shot. Wait till you hear this:
What the CDC needs to do is they need to tell us who is getting hospitalized this year and who’s dying. What are their ages? What — exactly — are their co-morbidities? Did they get a vaccine? If so, when was their last dose?
More importantly, did they get an antiviral?
I’ll take myself as an example. I’ve had three doses of the Wuhan-1 strain. My last dose was in November of 2021. I had a mild, two-day infection in May of 2022. I think I’m protected. I didn’t get last year’s bivalent vaccine. I’m not getting this year’s vaccine.
I would like the CDC to answer those questions.
One thing that kind of bothers me a lot is when people say, well, there’s no downside. First of all, whenever you take any medicine or any biological, there’s a downside. If there’s an upside, they’ll have a downside. The downside may be rare. It may be um, very rare. But nonetheless, there’s ALWAYS a downside.
And we’re going to find out about this vaccine over time.
It is a novel strategy. We certainly were surprised by myocarditis, and pericarditis. And you’ll see whether or not, over time, you know, when we’re five years into this, ten years into this, fifteen years into this, whether there’s any evidence of residual myocardial disease.
Because the reason you have myocarditis is you’re making immune response to your own heart muscle. I mean, it appears to be generally transient and short-lived, but there’s invariably a spectrum of disease, and we’ll find out about that over time.
It’s perfectly reasonable to take those risks if the benefits are clear. But when the benefits aren’t clear, then it’s not so reasonable to risk, even rare risk.
Sadly, some people could have used the information that “there’s ALWAYS a downside” and “we’ll find out the side effects over time.”
Opinions, like viruses, evolve. But some people (like your humble author) shared Dr. Offit’s questions for the CDC — but we had those questions back in 2021. And we wondered about the long-term side effects back in 2021. Back when the government swore the jabs were the safest, most studied drugs in history.
But now the narrative is shifting. Again! Mark your score cards.
September 26, 2023 - Lack of access to HCQ was a major factor in COVID deaths, a new study finds - Rhoda Wilson
September 29, 2023 - De-Spike Naturally: An Oncologist's guide to Recovery
Episode 8 Silenced with Tommy Robinson and Dr. David Martin
FDA Repeats COVID Shot Fraud - Deceiving the Public Again in 2023 - Truth For Health
No comments:
Post a Comment