The Coverup: Wuhan, Fauci, and The Smoking Gun

For informational purposes only. Always do your own reserearc.

Episode 1

Episode 2

Episode 3

Preview to Episode 4
Once Episode 4 airs (not behind a paywall) I will post here.

Vaccines A Deep Dive: Be Informed and Do Your Own Research

 

This post is for informational purposes.  Do your own research.  I went down this rabbit hole after my 58 year old brother-in-law Mark died less than 48 hours after recieving his second Pfizer vaccine for COVID 19 in April 2021.  After having no issues from the vaccine he fell asleep in a chair in front of the TV and never woke up.  My deep dive lead me from COVID vaccine to all vaccines.  I remain open minded, but now do my own research before ever taking another vaccine. At the time of Mark's death when we reported to VAERS there were less than 1,000 deaths associated to this vaccine. As of this writing, (Sept 2024) on VAERS there are close to 37,000 death associated with this vaccine, but the vaccine is still being pushed on the market.  In 1976 the swine flu vaccine program was halted after about 200 people developed Guillain Barre syndrome. What has changed? Anyway the following is just provided for informational purposes only.  Do your own research.  The followings charts, videos, articles and books may help answer questions and offer informed consent when consenting to a vaccine in the future.   As always I bid you peace and blessings in this journey of life. 

+++

Background Video

Protecting Vaccine Exemptions with ICAN Lead Attorney Aaron Siri Sept 2023 (use timestamps if you don't want to watch the entire video) 

This video discusses childhood vaccines, mandates and exemptions.  Do vaccines stop the spread of disease? (timestamp 14:00) "It is important to note that FDA's licensure standards for vaccines do not require demonstration of the prevention of infection or transmission." FDA September 5, 2023 (22:00) In 1980 there were only 3 vaccines on the childhood list.  These caused so much harm that the vaccine manufacturers demanded immunity.  (National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act 1986) In 1986 Congress gave the vaccine manufacturers with vaccines on the childhood list immunity with the National Childhood Vaccine Act. (1:05)  What is a good clinical trial? (1:14) Were any vaccines on the childhood vaccine list tested against a placebo?  No. (Also see the book Turtles All the Way Down) Do vaccines cause autism? (1:23) 

Data on Autism by CDC - 1992 birth year 1 in 150 / 2012 birth year 1 in 36

Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule by Age 2024 

Clinical Trials with or without placebo  (None of the vaccine doses the CDC recommends for routine injection into children were licensed by the FDA based on a long-term placebo-controlled trial)

NEW VIDEO March 2026 by Aaron Siri on Childhood Vaccine Schedule 

Documentary (Childhood Vaccine Schedule)

Video Documentary - VAXXED: From Cover Up to Catastrophe (2016)

Video Documentary - VAXXED II: The People's Truth (2023)

Video Documentary - VAXXED III: Authorized to Kill (2024)

COVID VACCINE

The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer's Crimes Against Humanity by Naomi Wolf - Learn how Pfizer intended to cover up vaccine adverse effects as well as 1223 deaths during the initial 3 month roll out of the vaccine.  This statistic is on page 333 of the book.  The book also shows how Pfizer's mRnA COVID-19 clinical trial was flawed and the pharmaceutical company knew by November 2020 that the vaccine was neither safe for effective.  

Deception the Great COVID Cover-Up by Paul Rand

Book: Sacrifice by Dr. James Thorp - One of the few doctors from the maternal-fetal medicine realm who publicly protested the COVID shot as directly deadly to his patients' unborn babies. 

Books and Articles 

CHILDHOOD VACCINES

First Chapter Turtles All the Way Down tinyurl.com/TurtlesBookChap1Eng (Explanation on how childhood vaccines should be tested and how they are tested) 

If you are considering vaccines for your children take a look at Dr. Paul Thomas' The Vaccine Friendly Plan .  Also read this article by Dr Thomas The Alarming Rise in Autism and Chronic Childhood Health Issues (September 19, 2024).  Consider Reading Vax Facts: What to consider before vaccinating at all ages and all stages of life book by Dr. Paul Thomas and DeeDee Hoover

Article - 10 Years after HHS asked CDC to Study Safety of Childhood Vaccine Schedule, CDC Hasn't Produced it by Brian Hooker August 2023

Article - 58% of Infant Deaths Reported to VAERS occurred within 3 Days of Vaccination Research Shows by Brian Hooker August 2021 

HPV VACCINE 

Article - STD Vaccine that Exploited Cancer Fears (HPV Vaccine Part 1):  In this two-part series learn what HV is and how big a threat it is.  The article also looks at the creation of the vaccine and its effect on cervical cancer rates.  For informational use only.  Be informed.  

Article - STD Predatory Shot Peddlers (HPV Vaccine Part 2): This part dives into the marketing machine behind the HPV Gardasil shot and the safety risks. For informational use only.  Be informed. 

Videos (mostly on Childhood Schedule)

Get Informed - ICAN - Informational Videos on Vaccines (plethora of information if you want to really go down the rabbit hole) 

Polio: The Founding Myth of Modern Medicine (Jefferey Jaxen Investigates, Part 1 & 2)  

Highwire Del Bigtree: Episode 347: Vaccine Experts Under Oath - November 2023

This video is a discussion between Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree on vaccine's and features videos of vaccine experts. Stanley Plotkin(15:32) Article 2013 - New Report Reveals that the U.S. has the highest first-day infant death rate of all the industrial countries in the world. Article 2023 - Infant mortality rate for U.S. in 2022 rose 3% from 2021, the first year-to-year increase since 2001.  Why is that? (21:28) Vaccine post licensure (22:00) Vaccines that parents with injured children feel cause autism are HepB, DTaP, MMR (24:40) Dr. Bernadine Healy on susceptibility to vaccines in children (27:00) One study thrown out that found correlation between DTaP and autism (31:00) Dr. Kathryn Edwards (39:00) Religious exemption (48:00)

Highwire Del Bigtree: Episode 352: The Informed Consent Imperative December 2023 (Aaron Siri presents 'What is Informed Consent' before members of the Novel Coronavirus Southwestern Intergovernmental Committee in Arizona. Explains the pillars of informed consent and the essential tenant of freedom and liberty.) 

Highwire Del Bigtree: Episode 359: Safeguarding Vaccine Exemptions with Aaron Siri February 2024 (Second of two presentations to Arizona's Novel Coronavirus Committee.  Explains vaccine exemptions both religious and medical) 

Highwire Del Bigtree: Episode 378: Siri Testifies: New Hampshire "Market Forces" June 2024 (Aaron Siri, gives expert testimony on COVID Response Efficacy)

Highwire Del Bigtree - Episode 379: Siri Testifies: New Hampshire "Clinical Trials"  June 2024 (Aaron Siri's expert testimony before the New Hampshire House Committee on COVID Response Efficacy.  Testimony drills down on serious concerning missteps with regulators handling of vaccine safety.)

Highwire Del Bigtree - Episode 388: Aaron Siri Testifies: New Hampshire "Post-Licensure Safety" Sept 2024 (ICAN's lead attorney Aaron Siri exposes the shortcomings of post-licensure safety, and shatters the claim that the connection between vaccines and autism has been 'thoroughly studied.') 

Reports 

We Can Do This: An Assessment of the Department of Health and Human Services’ COVID-19 Public Health Campaign - The House Committee on Energy and Commerce’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations has conducted an investigation into the effectiveness and scientific accuracy of the “We Can Do This” COVID-19 vaccine promotional campaign (“Campaign”) launched by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), in partnership with the Fors Marsh Group (FMG), which describes itself as a full-service behavior change research and strategy firm. This nationwide multimedia advertising campaign ran from August 2020 through June 2023 and cost over $900 million in taxpayer funds.

Covid Vaccine Victim Exposes the System
This is the story of Brianne Dressen, a participant in the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine trials.  After experiencing severe side effects, she was abandoned by the drug company and later diagnosed with 'Post Vaccine Neuropathy' through a study by the NIH.  Both the NIH and the FDA buried the study while continuing to roll out the vaccines.

Jillian Michaels: Exposing COVID and Fighting the Deep State with Senator Ron Johnson (12. 2024)

       

New York Times Op-Ed: Why COVID Probably Started in a Lab

These articles from June 2024 are behind a paywall “Why Covid Probably Started in a Lab,” and “An Object Lesson on How to Destroy Public Trust.” Better late then never.  Here is a synopsis from Coffee and Covid June 10, 2024 by Jeff Childers  

Can we finally have an honest conversation about covid?  First of all, who has been stopping that honest conversation from happening? The New York Times, among others! And second, the headline clearly implies the previous conversations weren’t honest.

Who has been lying? I’ll let you answer that one.

The first author attempted to answer those questions. Dr. Alina Chan, a molecular biologist at M.I.T. and Harvard, and co-author of “Viral: The Search for the Origin of Covid-19,” blamed all the confusion on reflexive partisan politics:

Next, the Times’ mind-controlled readers finally read what we’ve been trying desperately to tell them for almost four years—science created this historic catastrophe:

Folks, it’s slow, but we are making progress. I could quibble about the specifics, and the narrative framing, but it was all there in the op-ed. Though Dr. Chan was careful to point the finger of blame back at the Chinese, Dr. Ralph Baric, the North Carolina researcher squatting at the middle of the controversy, was named five times. He was not blamed so much as used as undisclosed evidence of lab origin:

Though China took center stage, the piece didn’t quite let the U.S. completely off the hook either. Dr. Chan clearly connected U.S. funding and research priorities to the pandemic, and even (gently) called out the NIAID’s top human cockroach and beagle torturer, Fauci:

Remarkably, there was more in Dr. Chan’s piece that I agreed with than disagreed with (though she could have gone much further).

The connected companion op-ed about lost trust in science was authored by Princeton professor and regular Times opinion columnist Zeynep Tufekci. It was equally honest — at least, as honest as we’ve yet seen in corporate media to date. Tufecki first blamed government officials as the ones who created the covid confusion, and she didn’t accept it was any accident:

Times readers may have ignored last week’s Congressional hearings, but now they’re reading about the low-lights. Things are heating up. Professor Tufekci outright rejected the pathetic official excuse that we didn’t know what we didn’t know, but did the best we could at the time. She called government officials (i.e., Fauci) arrogant and obstinate cowards:

Tufecki is no conspiracy-minded conservative. The Professor is an ardent pro-masker, a voluntary quarantiner, and a vaccine aficionado, admitting she “gleefully rolled up” her sleeve to get the shots. Gleefully.

So it was all the more remarkable that she echoed Coffee & Covid, decrying the pandemic’s “paternalistic, infantilizing government messaging” and calling, in her own way, for truth, transparency, and trust:

The 1,600 comments to Dr. Tufecki’s op-ed give great insight into the average Times reader’s stubborn mentality. Most commenters completely missed the point, making the elitist argument that, notwithstanding bad public messaging, they themselves always knew what was really going on, thanks to “serious” media like the Times.

Insert massive eye roll.

Here’s a typical example, a short exchange in the comments between an outraged commenter and the feisty Professor, who shot right back, comparing Atutu to an anti-vaxxer:

Professor Tupekci’s op-ed caused many commenters to bristle with barely concealed rage. They doggedly insisted that calling out the pandemic’s mistakes was unfair armchair quarterbacking, and was downright harmful to the narrative. Here’s one commenter, Elizabeth:

I included this taste of the comments because they highlighted the real problem, which is the zany zeitgeist or demonic spirit of the age. The fundamental trouble comes from the big group of folks who still believe, ipso facto, that government cannot ever err.

It is tempting to blame partisan politics, as Dr. Chan did. After all, it’s mostly leftists who’ve defensively circled the wagons around lying government officials. But politics is downstream from culture.  What about personal health decisions could possibly be political?

In fact, before the pandemic, it was the left-leaning, crunchy granola folks who were always most likely to favor alternative medicines and employee rights. But the pandemic’s wrecking ball knocked normal politics askew, and now it’s all backwards and upside down.

If politics is downstream from culture, then to fix politics, we must first fix the culture. Even if fixing culture is vexingly difficult, the phenomenon is well known. In 1841, in his seminal book “Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds,” Charles Mackay famously noted, “Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, one by one.”

If covid isn’t an extraordinary popular delusion, then I am a spicy pepperoni Hot Pocket. For whatever reason, good or bad, limited hangout or genuine contrition, the New York Times seems to be slowly recovering its senses. And I’m counting that as progress.

Articles and Videos of Interest January - June 2024 (McCullough Peer Reviewed COVID Vaccine Article, Dr. Zelenko, COVID, CIA, Vaccines, Senator Ron Johnson, Tucker Carlson, Military Industrial Complex, Censorship)

 

MOST IMPORTANT ARTICLE TODATE
Covid 19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign - by M. Nathaniel Mead, Stephanie Seneff Russ Wolfinger, Jessica Rose, Kris Denhaerynck Steve Kirsch, Peter A. McCullough (January 24, 2024)
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign - same as above (National Library of Medicine)

EXCELLENT Roundtable by Senator Ron Johnson (Feb 26, 2024)

Excellent Video Roundtable on COVID Vaccine (April 2024) 

THE VACCINE DEATH REPORT Evidence of millions of deaths and serious adverse events resulting from the experimental COVID-19 injections B Y DAVID J OH N S OR E NS E N & DR . VL ADIMIR ZE L E NK O MD V E R S I O N 1 . 0 S E P T E M B E R 2 0 2 1

https://stopworldcontrol.com/downloads/en/vaccines/vaccinereport.pdf

Federal Health Agencies and the COVID Cartel: What Are They Hiding? 

Senator Ron Johnson leas a roundtable discussion on what are Federal Health Agencies Hiding.  
Speakers expose how the COVID Cartel (federal health agencies Big Pharma, legacy media
and Big Tech) engage in censorship and coverups.  Speakers include: Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. 
Jessica Rose, Mr. Ed Dowd, Mr. Kevin McKernan, Dr. David Gortler, Dr. Harvey Risch, Ms. 
Barbara Loe Fisher, Dr. Brian Hooker, Mr. Del Bigtree, Dr. Sabine Hazan, Dr. Pierre Kory, 
Dr. Christian Perronne, Dr. Raphael Lataster, Ms. Lara Logan, Mr. Jason Christoff, Mr. Rodney
Palmer, Dr. Mattias Desmet, Dr. Bret Weinstein,  Mr. Randy Hillier, Dr. Sorin Titus Mancacius, 
Mr. Rob Roos, Mr. Phillip Kruse

January 12, 2024 - The Excess Death Elephant in the Room (Highwire) 

January 12, 2024 - Court Decision Forces CDC to Release V-Safe 'Free Text' Data (Highwire) 

January 12, 2024 - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene leads a Hearing on Injuries Caused by COVID-19 Vaccines  or try this link. 

“EXCLUSIVE: Veterans Affairs Found Safety Signal for Pfizer COVID Vaccine, Never Disclosed It.” (from Jeff Childers Coffee & Covid January 15, 2024) It was even more embarrassing for the government than the headline suggested.

Fauci deservedly gets all the hate, but slippery CDC official Tom Shimabukuro is just as culpable and maybe even more directly responsible for millions of unnecessary deaths and injuries from the vaccines. He should be just as well known as Fauci. While Fauci was appearing as the official face of the pandemic on every rapper’s podcast to push the jabs, Shimabukuro was the one behind the scenes holding the pillow smothering legitimate scientists and ensuring nothing made the jabs look bad.

Through public records requests, Epoch got hold of an email from the Veteran’s Administration showing the CDC was told about the myocarditis signal on May 13, 2021 — right after the jab campaign started — and even though the agency would deny the obvious connection between the vaccines and heart problems until nearly a year later in 2022, long after most young people had already been vaccinated.

Here’s the May 2021 email from a VA doctor to the CDC official in charge of the covid vaccines, Dr. Shimabukuro:

“We have a signal for myocarditis/pericarditis…with Pfizer vaccine following the 1st dose,” VA doctor Fran Cunningham wrote to Dr. Shimabukuro on May 13, 2021. Dr. Cunningham, who is probably worried about keeping her job, did not answer Epoch’s calls or emails. When asked about the agency’s lack of response to Cunningham’s email, a CDC spokesman told Epoch flatly that the VA later determined the signal “was not a true signal.”

Really. But how? How did they determine it was “not a true signal?” I mean, however you slice it, it was a true signal, as the CDC would finally admit over a year later. Is the CDC saying the VA’s particular signal was wrong, even though in a bigger picture way it was right? Was it more likely the VA determined it was “not a true signal” because they were told it was not a true signal and to shut up fast?

In May 2021, there were plenty of other signals of jab problems besides the VA email, such as everything flooding into VAERS. And the person at the CDC who made sure nobody found out about the problems was Dr. Tom Shimabukuro.

February 15, 2024 The Highwire Episode 359 Safeguarding Vaccines Exemptions with Aaron Siri

February 16, 2024 - Tucker Carlson interviews Mike Benz on Censorship and the Military Industrial Complex. 

April 21, 2024 FACT CHECK: CDC Lies [Again] About C-19 Vax/Injuries

Subscribe & Support Us @ www.TomRenz.com

FACT CHECK: CDC Lies [Again] About C-19 Vax/Injuries Subscribe & Support Us @ www.TomRenz.com TOM RENZ APR 21 For those not aware, on April 11 the CDC released a report that alleges there is no link between COVID-19 vaccination and sudden cardiac death in young people. If that lie wasn't made by a government agency with legal implications - I would laugh at it. Unsurprisingly, the lamestream media has jumped all over it, frothing at the mouth - eager to spread this misinformation as some sort of ‘gotcha’ - directed at those who oppose these experimental gene therapy products. In case you missed the CDC report, here’s a quick breakdown of it, as reported by ‘The Defender’ a publication of Children’s Health Defense. “The study — published in the CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) — came from Oregon public health authorities’ analysis of roughly 1,300 death certificates of Oregon residents ages 16-30 who died from a heart condition or unknown reasons between June 1, 2021, and Dec. 31, 2022. Forty deaths occurred among people who received a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and only three occurred within 100 days after vaccination, the authors said. The authors examined the death certificate data to determine what coroners listed as the cause(s) of death. Of the three deaths that occurred within 100 days of COVID-19 vaccination, two were attributed to chronic underlying conditions. The cause of death for the third was undetermined, they said. Meanwhile, they said 30 deaths were attributed to COVID-19 infection.” So, they cherry picked data from one state - just 1,300 people- and they limited the study period to 100 days post-injection. Experts like Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist, and Brian Hooker, Ph.D., chief scientific officer of Children's Health Defense (CHD), claim that the CDC's study was flawed and that its authors neglected to mention numerous earlier studies that linked the COVID-19 vaccination to cardiac issues. Critics of the report argue that the authors of the study failed to use appropriate search terms for finding possible cases of cardiac death related to COVID-19 vaccination.

May 2 2024 CoV Subcommittee Questions Peter Daszak

Issues report of findings that we've known for two years. By John Leake 

May 6, 2024 - The CIA & the Jab, Breakdown of the Law - The Tom Renz Show ep. 395

Articles and Videos of Interest November - December 2023 (WHO, COVID Vaccine and Cancer, Recall the Shots, Pneumonia, Vaccine Experts Under Oath )

November 2023: Michele Bachmann Why We Must Stop the WHO before May 2024 to Save Medical Freedom - with Dr. Drew 

We The People 50 Recall the Shots 

10.11.23 Probably the Most Important Topic of Our Time: DNA Contaminants in COVID Shots can trigger Cancer, Alter Human Genome  Children's Defense League

11.21.23 New Report:  Young People Dying of Cancer at 'Exploitive' Rates, UK Government Data Show 

11.23.23 Dell Bigtree The Highwire: Episode 347 - Vaccine Experts Under Oath 

12.4.23 White Lung Pneumonia Outbreak Connected to mRNA or COVID 19? With Tom Renz and Ask Dr. Drew 

12.19.23 - Dr Drew and Dr. Clare Craig: The 12 Beliefs About Viral COVID That Are not supported by Evidence

 

Articles and Videos of Interest August - October 2023 (Cleveland Clinic Study on COVID Vaccine, Guidance from Florida for COVID vaccine, Nipah Virus, Cochrane Report, Pfizer Trials, Peer Review Report Ivermectin, The Great Reset, Tom Renz, Dr. David Martin)

 

Peer-Reviewed Study Shows Ivermectin Reduced Deaths by 74% !!!!!

PUBLISHED AUGUST 8 2023

August 18 , 2023 Ivor Cummins: Resisting The Great Reset & Agenda 2030 w/ Dr. Kelly Victory – Ask Dr. Drew

August 21, 2023 Pandemic Origin Research Update w/ Dr. Drew, Kelly Victory and Attorney Tom Renz 

Something Not Right Series - National Emergency? 

Something Not Right Series - To Mask or Not to Mask 

June 2023 COVID Was State Sponsored Genocide - Dr. David Martin to EU Parliament 

August 2023 Dr. David Martin Don't Fear the Coming Lockdowns

August 28, 2023 First-Ever Spike Detox Protocol Appears in US Medical Journal 

August 29. 2023 - Stormy Weather C & C News  (See meat of article below) 

Even worse, you probably think you couldn’t possibly be surprised by anything the CDC does anymore, no matter how silly or bereft of human intelligence, or dumber than a Martian rock. Well, you’d better sit down. The Epoch Times ran a story yesterday headlined, “CDC Quietly Removes COVID Vaccine Adverse Events Collection From Website.”

There are two adverse event collections systems. The first and more well-known is VAERS, an “antiquated” system that Branch Covidians love to dismiss out of hand because it is a “self-reporting” system and “anybody” can enter a report (under penalty of perjury and federal criminal prosecution if false, with cases only published after review by FDA officials, but still).

The second, newer system is called V-SAFE. It requires vaccinees to register using their mobile devices and then complete periodic surveys about their ongoing health. It is a long-term safety monitoring system.

About 10 million Americans who got the covid jabs signed up for V-SAFE.

Yesterday, the CDC unceremoniously pulled the plug on V-SAFE for covid, abruptly announcing a retroactive data cut-off of June 30th. It did not explain its baffling decision to terminate the highly-celebrated, high-tech program. According to the announcement, the CDC had also stealthily cut off any new registrations back on May 19th.

Wrapping it up.

For context, and for a possible explanation for canceling the program, since CDC isn’t saying, here are some V-SAFE stats. According to an analysis by ICAN, as of September 2022, the 10.1 million users had completed over 151 million monthly health surveys using the platform (about 15 each). Of the 10.1 million users, over one-third, 3.53 million people, reported being “adversely impacted” by their vaccination.

Of those adversely impacted, 1.2 million folks reported being “unable to conduct normal activities,” which sounds bad, and 1.3 million said they had to miss school or work. About 800,000 actually needed medical treatment for their “adverse impact.”

Between the two companies, Moderna registered 1.6 million adverse impacts, and Pfizer had 1.4 million.

Half (48.5%) of the people who needed medical care sought “urgent care,” and 15% had to visit emergency rooms. From the ICAN review:

One of the most compelling arguments against the jabs from the outset was the absolute absence of any long-term safety data for a brand-new, never tested mRNA vaccine platform. For some reason, the CDC just pulled the plug on its newest, most-reliable system for obtaining long-term safety data.

The CDC did not respond to Epoch’s request for comment.

September 3, 2023 BREAKING NEWS: APPELLATE COURT JUDGES TO FDA: "WE ARE NOT CONVINCED."—The FLCCC News Capsule for September 3, 2023

A Compendium of the Latest COVID-19 News, Facts & Features FLCCC ALLIANCE

Pfizer's Own Trials Showed a 24% GREATER Likelihood of Dying in the Vaccine Group After 6 Months

Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine (Cleveland Clinic Study)  Background The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a bivalent COVID-19 vaccine protects against COVID-19. Results Among 51017 employees, COVID-19 occurred in 4424 (8.7%) during the study. In multivariable analysis, the bivalent vaccinated state was associated with lower risk of COVID-19 during the BA.4/5 dominant (HR, .71; 95% C.I., .63-.79) and the BQ dominant (HR, .80; 95% C.I., .69-.94) phases, but decreased risk was not found during the XBB dominant phase (HR, .96; 95% C.I., .82-.1.12). Estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) was 29% (95% C.I., 21%-37%), 20% (95% C.I., 6%-31%), and 4% (95% C.I., -12%-18%), during the BA.4/5, BQ, and XBB dominant phases, respectively. Risk of COVID-19 also increased with time since most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received.

Earlier article had the following graph showing the more doses the higher the risk of contacting COVID

Wild Fire Maui 

Cochrane Report - Do physical measure such as handwashing or wearing masks stop or slow down the spread of respiratory viruses? 

Spike Detox Protocol 

 VIRAL-GO-ROUND ☙ Sunday, September 17, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS 

Sunday bonus post! Nipah virus roundup [open]; CIA bribes own analysts to lie to Congress; 1st poll predicts Trump landslide; week of disasters roundup; Dr. Risch on turbo cancer; Paxton freed; more.

JEFF CHILDERS SEP 17 ∙ PREVIEW

READ IN APP

Good morning, loyal C&C supporters! It’s Sunday. Your bonus roundup includes: a Nipah-virus roundup shows we may be back on the NIH’s viral merry-go-round again; CIA bribes its own analysts to lie about covid’s lab origins; first major poll to predict Trump landscape; many major disasters this week; Greek floods; Libya floods; earthquake in Morocco; Dr. Harvey Risch discusses turbo-cancers on American Thought Leaders; and in fantastic news, the attempted impeachment of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton went down in flames yesterday.

 THE C&C ARMY POST 

 Due to the urgency and potential significance of today’s Nipah story, C&C is providing that part of today’s post to everyone.

 WORLD NEWS AND COMMENTARY 

 You’re not going to believe this story, but here we go again. Just wait till you see all the connecting parts. We’ll begin with a Hindustan Times story that ran yesterday headlined, “Nipah virus: Health department tightens restrictions in Kerala.” Yep. They’re doing it again.

Kerala is an urban political region in southwest India where 33 million people live. The Kerala region is subdivided into about 22,000 tiny ‘wards’, which are comparable to village or neighborhood councils. Wards typically contain between 5,000 and 20,000 people.

Nipah virus is a relatively-new, high-fatality respiratory virus that first appeared in India back in 2001. It’s a nasty bug. It features a startling 40%-75% mortality rate, is rated for BSL-4, the highest biolab security requirement, and is a CDC designated “Bioterrorism Agent.” Articles describing the current two human deaths variously suggest a zoonotic (animal) origin for the virus either from pigs or, wait for it, fruit bats.

It reportedly spreads through body fluids.

Nipah virus is NOT airborne. Of course, that’s not stopping everybody in Kerala from maniacally wearing masks because, why would it? Masks can stop any kind of virus using their magical mask powers. You just have to make the right sacrifices to the mask gods, or something.

Two deaths is not an outbreak. The official alarm seems to stem from the fact that the second guy who died was contact traced to the first victim. The second guy ran into the first guy at the hospital, which strongly suggests human-to-human transmission. And that’s what has everyone so excited.

One case of human transmission.

In spite of the fact that all post-pandemic studies of lockdowns concluded lockdowns don’t work, and cause enormous unintended harms, the article reported that India’s health ministry has already declared 45 Kerala wards as a “containment zone” after discovering the two Nipah deaths. The containment order imposed a useless lockdown, restricting access to the 45 wards, shuttering schools, prohibiting public gatherings, nixing “non-essential” businesses, mandating masks, requiring testing and tracing, and setting a 5pm curfew.

It was not clear from the Hindustan Times article (or any of the other articles) how India’s ministry of health concluded that a lockdown was needed for a non-airborne virus. Apparently you don’t even need to explain it anymore.

In case you are germaphobically fretting over this new viral threat, don’t worry! Just last year in July, Moderna and Fauci’s NIAID started a clinical trial for a new mRNA vaccine for … the Nipah virus! What good luck!

But wait, there’s more. Almost exactly two years ago, researchers published a study on arXiv concluding they’d found Indian-origin Nipah virus DNA in, get this, the five original covid-19 patients at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) lab.

The researchers were astonished finding Nipah virus where it shouldn’t be, because it proved “that research at WIV was being conducted on an assembled  infectious clone.” This was so astonishing because the BSL-3-rated Wuhan lab wasn’t supposed to be working on any BSL-4-level viruses:

Research involving Nipah [NiV] infectious clones has never been reported to have occurred at the WIV…  [these findings] indicate that research at WIV was being conducted on an assembled NiV infectious clone. Contamination of patient sequencing reads by an infectious NiV clone of the highly pathogenic Bangladesh strain could indicate a significant breach of BSL-4 protocols. We call on WIV to explain the purpose of this research on infectious clones of Nipah Virus, the full chronology of this work, and to explain how and at what stage of sample preparation this contamination occurred.

I’ll give you two guesses. Which do you think happened: one, the Wuhan lab was immediately forced to explain why it was secretly experimenting on a dangerous potential bioweapon like Nipah, or two, everybody completely ignored this shocking 2021 study?

Yep. It was two.  But the story didn’t completely die. One year later in 2022, Congress heard testimony that the Wuhan lab was experimenting on Nipah. Here’s the headline from the Washington Times’ August 9th, 2022 article:

The article reported that a Senate subcommittee on emerging threats took testimony from a scientific witness, Dr. Steven Quay, who testified the Wuhan Institute of Virology was carrying out synthetic biology research on the Nipah virus genome in December 2019, right around the same time the first covid-19 cases surfaced in Wuhan.

Dr. Quay was blunt. He accused the WIV of bioengineering Nipha. He told Senators, “Nipah is a BSL-4 level pathogen and a CDC-designated bioterrorism agent. This is the most dangerous gain-of-function research I have ever encountered. We should assume this research continues to this day at the WIV.”

But it gets better. In 2021, around the same time Fauci’s NIAID started working with Moderna to trial a Nipah mRNA vaccine, Fauci also awarded a separate $2.3 million dollar grant to study the Nipah virus in bats, and guess who he awarded the grant to?

Yep. Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, who at the time was up to his dirty, bioweapons money-laundering neck in the covid disaster. And … bats again. They love the bat viruses. Someday we’ll figure out why.

But wait… the story gets even better! Guess what particular medication that, in 2019, the NIH  found was allegedly “completely protective” against Nipah? Hint: Fauci loves this medication. Yep. You guessed it. Run-death-is-near:

Are you feeling the Dejá vu yet? Next, consider this: In May 2018, Johns Hopkins ran one of its now-infamous “tabletop exercise” planning sessions, this time using a bioengineered Nipah-Flu combo virus as the simulation’s subject.

The last line in the event’s description was the most chilling:

As a lawyer, I would call it “real world evidence” that there’s a study and testimony proving the Wuhan lab — which used gain-of-function techniques to engineer the covid virus by making it more transmissible in humans — was (or is) also working on gain of function on the Nipah virus.

I’m telling you, these health bureaucrats and experts are going to get us all killed one of these days.

THE BOTTOM LINE

Wild-type Nipah is not a pandemic candidate, for two good reasons, First, it has a too-high fatality rate. People get too sick too fast for it to spread efficiently. Second and more important, Nipah isn’t airborne. Transmission requires physical contact, which means: no super-spreading.

It’s true that could change if a new weaponized version of the virus suddenly appears, but that hasn’t happened yet. India’s been dealing with small Nipah outbreaks like this for twenty years since 2001, and newspapers have been wrongly predicting Nipah pandemics all that time.

Based on what we know, it looks more like India is overreacting than anything else. If and when it looks like the usual suspects will try knitting Nipah into a pandemic, then I’ll offer suggestions for how we should respond. But, in yet another coincidence, I have seen at least one published study suggesting ivermectin is effective against the family of viruses that includes Nipah. You might want to order yourself a couple boxes.

For now, the real story is not India The real story is Wuhan: the Wuhan lab is experimenting with Nipah! That should be a four-alarm fire. And the NIH is funding it! Our representatives need to pull the plug for good on our uselessly-dangerous big health agencies, and we need to shut down that lab in Wuhan before something worse than covid happens...

Guidelines for COVID-19 Boosters September 13, 2023 (State of Florida) 

 UPSIDES AND DOWNSIDES ☙ Tuesday, September 26, 2023 ☙ C&C NEWS 

Now we arrive at celebrity vaccine scientist Dr. Paul Offit, a central figure on the FDA’s vaccine advisory committee, the one that approved the jabs for kids without any debate. Call me naive, but I was actually reassured when Dr. Offit’s name first came up, back in the halcyon days of the early pandemic, back when I still believed the government had some idea it knew what it was doing.

After all, I had read Dr. Offit’s book, “Pandora’s Lab: Seven Stories of Science Gone Wrong.” In the book, Offit described all kinds of horrible mistakes that science plus government has made over the years, such as by repeatedly approving successive generations of opioids for pain treatment, each one more destructive than the last. I figured if anyone understood the potential for the horrifying long-term risks inherent in hasty, politically-driven drug approvals, it would be Dr. Paul Offit.

He also has a calm, capable, grandfatherly way of explaining things that is soothing and very reassuring. For example, last year in this clip Dr. Offit explained to jab takers why they didn’t need to worry about any long-term side effects from the covid jabs:

We also know historically when you look at vaccines and you find safety problems — and certainly, there have been safety problems, severe safety problems associated with vaccines — they virtually always been found within two months of getting the vaccine, and now we have really two years worth of data. And I don’t think there are going to be any surprises at this point.

And that’s why it’s important to be vaccinated. Thank you.

See? Just wait two months and you’ll be fine. Or at least, that was 2022 science. Now it’s 2023, the Science™ is evolving. Yesterday, Dr. Offit published a new video clip, in which he explained his rationale for not getting the new and improved booster shot. Wait till you hear this:

What the CDC needs to do is they need to tell us who is getting hospitalized this year and who’s dying.  What are their ages? What — exactly — are their co-morbidities? Did they get a vaccine? If so, when was their last dose?

More importantly, did they get an antiviral?

I’ll take myself as an example. I’ve had three doses of the Wuhan-1 strain. My last dose was in November of 2021. I had a mild, two-day infection in May of 2022. I think I’m protected. I didn’t get last year’s bivalent vaccine. I’m not getting this year’s vaccine.

I would like the CDC to answer those questions.

One thing that kind of bothers me a lot is when people say, well, there’s no downside. First of all, whenever you take any medicine or any biological, there’s a downside. If there’s an upside, they’ll have a downside. The downside may be rare. It may be um, very rare. But nonetheless, there’s ALWAYS a downside.

And we’re going to find out about this vaccine over time.

It is a novel strategy. We certainly were surprised by myocarditis, and pericarditis. And you’ll see whether or not, over time, you know, when we’re five years into this, ten years into this, fifteen years into this, whether there’s any evidence of residual myocardial disease.

Because the reason you have myocarditis is you’re making immune response to your own heart muscle. I mean, it appears to be generally transient and short-lived, but there’s invariably a spectrum of disease, and we’ll find out about that over time.

It’s perfectly reasonable to take those risks if the benefits are clear. But when the benefits aren’t clear, then it’s not so reasonable to risk, even rare risk.

Sadly, some people could have used the information that “there’s ALWAYS a downside” and “we’ll find out the side effects over time.”

Opinions, like viruses, evolve. But some people (like your humble author) shared Dr. Offit’s questions for the CDC — but we had those questions back in 2021. And we wondered about the long-term side effects back in 2021. Back when the government swore the jabs were the safest, most studied drugs in history.

But now the narrative is shifting. Again! Mark your score cards.

September 26, 2023 - Lack of access to HCQ was a major factor in COVID deaths, a new study finds - Rhoda Wilson 

September 29, 2023 - De-Spike Naturally: An Oncologist's guide to Recovery 

Episode 8 Silenced with Tommy Robinson and Dr. David Martin 

FDA Repeats COVID Shot Fraud - Deceiving the Public Again in 2023 - Truth For Health