Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label Dr. Ryan Cole. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dr. Ryan Cole. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 1, 2022

COVID Videos and Articles February 2022 (Ivermectin Trials, Ivermectin Meta Analysis, HCQ Meta Analysis, Vaccine Injuries, Cancer Trend, Fertility Trends, MIS-C, Myocarditis, DOD COVER UP)

 Do Your Own Research - Not medical advice - Make your own decisions - Think for yourself 

 https://stopworldcontrol.com/


+++

+++

Rare Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome Detected in Vaccinated Young: Lancet Study  MIS-C

By Naveen Athrappully
 
February 25, 2022 Updated: February 25, 2022

+++

02/25/22

8-Year-Old Boy Dies of MIS 7 Days After Pfizer Vaccine, VAERS Report Shows

VAERS data released Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention included a total of 1,134,984 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 24,402 deaths and 196,203 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020, and Feb. 18, 2022.

+++

+++

+++

The Global Disinformation Campaign to Suppress The Evidence of Efficacy of Ivermectin

After a week of non-stop lectures, panels, speeches, and expert testimony, my new mission has now come into focus. 2.1.22 Pierre Kory 


+++

New Study on Ivermectin ‘Should Convince Any Naysayer’: Dr. Pierre Kory

By Zachary Stieber and Jan Jekielek
 
February 1, 2022 Updated: February 1, 2022



+++
February 1, 2022


+++

INFOGRAPHIC: Approved and Non-FDA Approved COVID-19 Treatments
 
February 7, 2022 Updated: February 7, 2022

+++
02/02/22

FDA Grants Full Approval of Moderna’s Spikevax COVID Vaccine — Another ‘Bait-and-Switch?’

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval of Moderna’s Spikevax COVID vaccine for people 18 and older. Similar to the agency’s licensing last year of Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, the approval raised a number of legal questions.


+++


+++
COVER UP!!!



+++

EPISODE 253: CANCELING COVID

HighWire 
February 3, 2022 


+++

‘Against The Wind’ With Dr. Paul Thomas

Science and medicine are at a crossroad and courageous health practitioners are standing up to ensure that humanity and integrity aren’t left behind in the name of “progress”. Dr. Paul Thomas is one of those leading the way and amplifying the voice of brave scientists and health care practitioners who are willing to put their careers on the line to make sure “health” and “care” are restored to health care.


+++
 2021 Jan; 163: 105207.
Published online 2020 Sep 21. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105207
PMCID: PMC7505114
PMID: 32971268

Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug

Mingyang Tang,a,b,1 Xiaodong Hu,c,1 Yi Wang,a,d Xin Yao,a,d Wei Zhang,a,b Chenying Yu,a,b Fuying Cheng,a,b Jiangyan Li,a,d and Qiang Fanga,d,e,*
+++

THE LAST AMERICAN VAGABOND 
February 12 2022

+++

+++
+++
I printed out this entire article, because it is behind a paywall.  

CDC Says Some People Should Wait Longer for Second COVID-19 Shot Due to Heart Inflammation Risk

By Zachary Stieber
 
February 23, 2022 Updated: February 23, 2022

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has officially altered its recommended COVID-19 vaccination schedule in a bid to address concerns about the elevated rate of heart inflammation seen among many groups who have gotten a vaccine.

The two most widely administered COVID-19 vaccines in the country are made by Moderna and Pfizer. Recipients are advised to get a two-dose primary series of each.

Before the new update, people were told to get a second Pfizer shot 21 days after the first, or a second Moderna shot 28 days after the first.

The new guidance says people can wait as long as eight weeks between the first and second jabs.

Lengthening the interval is a response to the higher-than-expected rates of myocarditis and pericarditis, two types of heart inflammation, found among men under 40 and some females after they’d gotten a second dose of the Pfizer or Moderna jabs.

“While absolute risk remains small, the relative risk for myocarditis is higher for males ages 12-39 years, and this risk might be reduced by extending the interval between the first and second dose,” the CDC says on its website.

Myocarditis alone after Moderna’s second dose was reported at a rate of 68 per million and after Pfizer’s second dose at a rate of about 47 per million in males 18 to 39, according to a government analysis of data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, a surveillance system. Several studies have pegged the risk in some groups of myocarditis following vaccination as higher than from COVID-19 itself, leading some experts to call for a partial pause of at least Moderna’s vaccine, if not Pfizer’s as well, but U.S. officials have not heeded those calls.

The CDC says it’s verified no post-vaccination deaths caused by myocarditis, but autopsies of two young men performed by state experts two young men said the vaccines appeared to lead to their deaths.

Some studies indicate that the risk may be reduced by extending the intervals, and Canada and other countries changed the recommended intervals months ago.

“The longer interval resulted in lower myocarditis rates, whereas the shorter interval had higher myocarditis and pericarditis rates,” Dr. Bryna Warshawsky of the Public Health Agency of Canada told a CDC vaccine advisory panel in a recent meeting.

There’s also hope that extending the intervals will trigger better immune system responses. Vaccine effectiveness goes down over time, and has proven particularly poor against the Omicron variant of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus.

The widening interval “maybe would reduce the incidence of having any adverse effects, especially myocarditis,” Dr. Peter Gulick, an associate professor of medicine at Michigan State University, told The Epoch Times. “Plus, there’s some evidence in the past that in certain groups that are young and or otherwise healthy, if you do extend it out you might get a better antibody response because what you do is you allow your immune system to mature a little bit from the first dose, and it gets to mature so that we get the second dose, it’s not too early where the immune system hasn’t matured enough.”

The new guidance applies to Americans 12 or older who haven’t already received a primary series. About 73 percent of Americans 12 or older have gotten a primary series as of Feb. 22, according to data reported by jurisdictions and health care providers to the CDC.

People with weakened immune systems should stick to the previous recommendations, as should adults 65 or older and “others who need rapid protection due to increased concern about community transmission or risk of severe disease,” the CDC says.

Those who do wait longer to get their second shot will have their recommended booster dose, should they decide to get one, pushed back. The vaccination schedule advises all Americans 12 and up to get a booster at 5 months or later after their second shot.

The change came months after the data were available supporting a shift, some experts noted, with multiple European countries extending the intervals last year.

Dr. Walid Gellad, professor of medicine at the University of Pittsburgh, called the update “months late” but added that it was “good to see this now as official guidance.”

An 8-week interval “may be optimal for some people … especially for young men,” he wrote on Twitter.

Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist who formerly worked at Baylor University Medical Center, said that extending the intervals wasn’t enough to restrict the risks of vaccine-induced myocarditis.

The only method “is to use restrictive sampling,” McCullough told The Epoch Times in an email. “That means to exclude the population who is at risk for the problem. Based upon the published literature that would exempt men below age 70, women below the age of 50 years, and those with underlying myocardial and pericardial disease. This would get us back to the population that has theoretical benefits of vaccines if they were targeted against future variants, that is, our high-risk seniors.”







Tuesday, October 5, 2021

COVID (In Children and Pregnancy, Patents, Religious Exemptions, Safety Problems Pfizer Trial, Dr. Ryan Cole on Organ Damage, Dr. Malone on COVID)

 The following are articles or videos on the topic of COVID: Dr. Martin is on patents, Religious Exemptions, Dr. Malone on the COVID-19 shot, Pandemic Response from Frontline Doctors, Talk by Dr. Peter McCullough, Why are we Vaccinating Children with COVID-19 Shot?, Open Letter to Dr. Fauci from 1988 (History is repeating itself) 



David E. Martin PhD is the developer of several innovation-based quantitative indices of public equities and founder of the Purple Bridge Funds and M-CAM International. He has worked closely with the United States Congress and numerous trade and financial regulatory agencies in the United States. Dr. Martin is also a Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia's Darden Graduate School of Business Administration.
Since 1999, Dr. Martin has been actively tracking patent applications and approvals for the purpose of identifying suspicious activity. In the 94-minute video shown below, he shares the findings from his research regarding the laboratory development of a pathogenic coronavirus that started in 1999 and released initially upon human populations in the SARS CoV-1 in 2002-2003, then again in MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in 2012, and then again in SARS CoV-2 which was renamed COVID-19, as shown below with evidence from the primary development lab in Wuhan China.



+++



+++

Referenced Data for Parents Concerning the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccination for Children Aged 5-12 (
  • By Steve Hatfill
  •  
  • 11-03-2021
  • )


    +++
    This is a live Conference 
    Hope it stays up

    +++
    11/04/21

    6 Studies Showing Why Children Don’t Need — and Shouldn’t Get — a COVID Vaccine

    We now have a major crisis as the race is on to vaccinate our 5- to 11-year-old children who bring no risk to the table, with a vaccine that has been shown to be sub-optimal and potentially harmful.

    +++

    FDA Buries Data on Seriously Injured Child in Pfizer’s Covid-19 Clinical Trial Oct 22, 2021 Aaron Siri


    FDA Illegally Authorizes Pfizer Vaccine for 5-11 Year Old Children

    Does the FDA know they are safe? No. Can you sue for harm? No. Is there an emergency for children? No. Can you always say "no" to this product? No. Is that dystopian? Yes. November 5, 2021 

    +++

    What is the Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNTV) to prevent a single COVID-19 fatality in kids 5 to 11 based on the Pfizer EUA application?

    And what are the risks that go along with injecting that many kids?


    NNTV, the standard policy tool that Pharma, the FDA, & CDC no longer want to talk about

    +++


    +++

    +++


    +++
    Religious Exemption Information 

    https://youtu.be/Uc4VmKSvRmI

    +++

    Report of Problems With Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Being Investigated: Contract Company

     
    November 4, 2021 Updated: November 4, 2021

    +++


    Pathologist Asks: Where Are Investigations Into Organ Damage Caused by COVID Vaccine?

    Pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole asks, after thousands of people have died following a COVID vaccine, where are the autopsies to investigate organ damage caused by the spike protein. 


    This video found in the link below is  from the America’s Frontline Doctors White Coat Summit was published in mid-August. In it, pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole succinctly outlines many of the health challenges associated with the experimental genetic therapy injection program. He asks, after thousands of people have died from the injection, where are the autopsies to investigate this investigational program?


    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/dr-ryan-cole-investigations-organ-damage-spike-protein-covid-vaccine/

    Story at-a-glance:

    • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration ignored warnings before the vaccine was distributed that it would likely cause organ damage — data published before and after the program was initiated showed it was the spike protein that damaged the microvasculature.
    • An analysis of 789 professional athletes with COVID-19 showed no adverse cardiac events in healthy individuals — however, the VAERS shows 11,793 people who had a heart attack or were diagnosed with myocarditis or pericarditis after the jab.
    • Data from a patient group treated by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko showed none of the 3,000 patients he treated within the first five day of the onset of COVID-19 went on to develop long-haul symptoms, including fatigue, brain fog or difficulty breathing.
    • The list of people reporting adverse events from the jab is growing. To tell their stories, two websites have been created since social media platforms are routinely removing any information about adverse events.
    +++

    Dr. Robert Malone is widely considered one of the key architects of the mRNA technology that is the basis of several prominent Covid vaccines. Although there is some controversy over the degree of his role in the technology, Malone acknowledges that he didn’t create the vaccine itself but rather played a key role in designing the tech on which it was based.

    Video Part 1 - Problems with Current Public Policy on COVID


    Although sometimes called an “anti-vaxxer,” Malone has in fact spent his entire career developing vaccines and believes that mRNA is a transformative vaccination platform that will ultimately have life-changing medical benefits in many applications. However, he feels that, in "the fog of war," the development of these vaccines was rushed, causing two significant problems. The first is that the "spike" protein that forms the crux of the vaccine can cause potential health issues, for which there is already ample evidence that has not been fully disclosed. The second is that, in the rush to get the vaccines to the masses, not enough testing was conducted to fully understand the potential risks and complications, as there would have been under normal, non-pandemic circumstances.

    Malone states he doesn’t have every answer regarding the vaccine's safety, but he also states that neither does the government. He believes there are potentially serious risks to the vaccines and that they have not been adequately tested, despite the government’s claims to the contrary. Some of those risks include to pregnant or child-bearing women.

    He also believes vaccines are, at best, a partial solution, but not the only solution, to the Covid problem. Malone argues that the essence of a good vaccination strategy is prevention and that vaccinating into a pandemic will ultimately not succeed. 

    In the case of the Covid pandemic, instead of stopping the spread, vaccines, he believes, are actually triggering more variants. Mutants such as the Delta variant, he says, are the direct result of the vaccines. He believes we are well past the point of using vaccines to turn the tide of the pandemic and so must seek alternative solutions. 


    Video Part 2 - Evolution of Virus Variants, and the 4-Prong Approach

    He advocates a four-pronged approach: 1) Use the vaccine for those at highest risk, such as the elderly; 2) Provide early treatment to help keep people out of the hospital; 3) Provide tools for individuals to assess their own risk; and 4) Provide tools for individuals to test whether they have Covid.


    Video Part 3 - Vaccine Development and Testing Process Concerns



    Video Part 4 - Risks to Pregnancy, and Conclusion
    +++

    Pandemic Response: Analysis & Lessons From Frontline Physicians & Scientists
    https://rumble.com/vnc7i4-pandemic-response-analysis-and-lessons-from-frontline-physicians-and-scient.html

    +++

    Winning the War Against Therapeutic Nihilism & Trusted Treatments vs Untested Novel Therapies (Dr. Peter McCullough)


    And 


    +++
    Why are We Vaccinating Children against COVID-19? 


    Highlights



    This article examines issues related to COVID-19 inoculations for children. The bulk of the official COVID-19-attributed deaths per capita occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, and the COVID-19 attributed deaths per capita are negligible in children. The bulk of the normalized post-inoculation deaths also occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, while the normalized post-inoculation deaths are small, but not negligible, in children. Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term (a few months), had samples not representative of the total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power because of their small size. Further, the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases. Most importantly, the clinical trials did not address long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.

    A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.


    READ FULL ARTICLE HERE: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475002100161X


    +++
    Open Letter to Dr. Fauci 
    https://www.villagevoice.com/2020/05/28/an-open-letter-to-dr-anthony-fauci/
    By Larry Kramer 
    Originally published May 31, 1988 
    The question, is history repeating itself?  

    “Fauci first took the world stage as the AIDS Czar in the 1980s, when he soon generated accusations of sacrificing the lives of AIDS patients to the interests of the pharmaceutical industry.  In February 2021 PBS described Fauci’s handling of HIV this way: During the height of the HIV epidemic, LGBTQ activists pressed him to make experimental treatment drugs available for gay men dying of AIDS.  They called on him to do something to stop the epidemic that was taking the lives of so many in their community.  They protested outside his office at the NIAID, where he was the director with his head on a stake.  They burned effigies of his body.  In 1988, AIDS activists Larry Kramer famously addressed an open letter (see above) to Fauci in the San Francisco Examiner, accusing him of murder.

    Under Fauci’s leadership, AZT, a very toxic, experimental drug, was approved for the treatment of AIDS under very chaotic conditions and remained controversial.  Fauci was pushing AZT for expanded patient populations including as a preventative for asymptomatic patients thought to be infected based on controversial HIV testing.  AZT was extremely expensive at $8,000 per patient per year (1988).  Fauci has also pushed a very expensive COVID-19 drug remdesivir, which as also proved to be toxic to many.  

    Did Fauci also suppress less expensive and more effective treatments that were safer for AIDS?  Yes!  Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) cased by a fungus is not generally a threat to humans.  However, from the beginning it became the most common opportunistic infection and the most common pneumonia in people living with HIV.  It killed many people.  The first choice for prevention and treatment among standard guides and many physicians were the sulfa drugs like Bactria which had a long history of being safe and effective.  It had already been used for 20 years to treat the same opportunistic pneumonia in cancer patients.  Bactria remains in widespread use today and is routinely prescribed for both approved and unapproved infections.  Fauci opposed Bactria, while pushing expensive, highly toxic experimental drugs on the community who responded by accusing Fauci of murdering thousands of gay men.  The story of Bactria sounds very similar to the story of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. 

    Under the direction of Dr. Anthony Fauci 33 years ago patients were dying of pneumocystis pneumonia, which could be successfully treated with cheap, safe sulfa drugs.  The activists pleaded with Dr. Fauci to issue guidance that suggested prophylactic treatment with Bactria.  Dr. Fauci refused.  Since the NIH refused to fund trials, activists raised the money themselves.  By the time the results were ready two years later, 17,000 patients had died needlessly.”  (Excerpt from COVID-19 and the Global Predators:  We Are the Prey, Peter and Ginger Breggin, pages 250 - 253).