The following are articles or videos on the topic of COVID: Dr. Martin is on patents, Religious Exemptions, Dr. Malone on the COVID-19 shot, Pandemic Response from Frontline Doctors, Talk by Dr. Peter McCullough, Why are we Vaccinating Children with COVID-19 Shot?, Open Letter to Dr. Fauci from 1988 (History is repeating itself)
David E. Martin PhD is the developer of several innovation-based quantitative indices of public equities and founder of the Purple Bridge Funds and M-CAM International. He has worked closely with the United States Congress and numerous trade and financial regulatory agencies in the United States. Dr. Martin is also a Batten Fellow at the University of Virginia's Darden Graduate School of Business Administration.
Since 1999, Dr. Martin has been actively tracking patent applications and approvals for the purpose of identifying suspicious activity. In the 94-minute video shown below, he shares the findings from his research regarding the laboratory development of a pathogenic coronavirus that started in 1999 and released initially upon human populations in the SARS CoV-1 in 2002-2003, then again in MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in 2012, and then again in SARS CoV-2 which was renamed COVID-19, as shown below with evidence from the primary development lab in Wuhan China.
"COVID-19 Vaccine Safety and Efficacy and the Urgent Need for Early Ambulatory Therapy" Dr. Peter McCullough (November 2021)
Referenced Data for Parents Concerning the Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccination for Children Aged 5-12 (
Hope it stays up
6 Studies Showing Why Children Don’t Need — and Shouldn’t Get — a COVID Vaccine
We now have a major crisis as the race is on to vaccinate our 5- to 11-year-old children who bring no risk to the table, with a vaccine that has been shown to be sub-optimal and potentially harmful.
FDA Buries Data on Seriously Injured Child in Pfizer’s Covid-19 Clinical Trial Oct 22, 2021 Aaron Siri
FDA Illegally Authorizes Pfizer Vaccine for 5-11 Year Old Children
Does the FDA know they are safe? No. Can you sue for harm? No. Is there an emergency for children? No. Can you always say "no" to this product? No. Is that dystopian? Yes. November 5, 2021
 |
What is the Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNTV) to prevent a single COVID-19 fatality in kids 5 to 11 based on the Pfizer EUA application?
And what are the risks that go along with injecting that many kids?
 |
NNTV, the standard policy tool that Pharma, the FDA, & CDC no longer want to talk about
Pathologist Asks: Where Are Investigations Into Organ Damage Caused by COVID Vaccine?
Pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole asks, after thousands of people have died following a COVID vaccine, where are the autopsies to investigate organ damage caused by the spike protein.
This video found in the link below is from the America’s Frontline Doctors White Coat Summit was published in mid-August. In it, pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole succinctly outlines many of the health challenges associated with the experimental genetic therapy injection program. He asks, after thousands of people have died from the injection, where are the autopsies to investigate this investigational program?
Story at-a-glance:
- The U.S. Food and Drug Administration ignored warnings before the vaccine was distributed that it would likely cause organ damage — data published before and after the program was initiated showed it was the spike protein that damaged the microvasculature.
- An analysis of 789 professional athletes with COVID-19 showed no adverse cardiac events in healthy individuals — however, the VAERS shows 11,793 people who had a heart attack or were diagnosed with myocarditis or pericarditis after the jab.
- Data from a patient group treated by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko showed none of the 3,000 patients he treated within the first five day of the onset of COVID-19 went on to develop long-haul symptoms, including fatigue, brain fog or difficulty breathing.
- The list of people reporting adverse events from the jab is growing. To tell their stories, two websites have been created since social media platforms are routinely removing any information about adverse events.
Video Part 1 - Problems with Current Public Policy on COVID
Although sometimes called an “anti-vaxxer,” Malone has in fact spent his entire career developing vaccines and believes that mRNA is a transformative vaccination platform that will ultimately have life-changing medical benefits in many applications. However, he feels that, in "the fog of war," the development of these vaccines was rushed, causing two significant problems. The first is that the "spike" protein that forms the crux of the vaccine can cause potential health issues, for which there is already ample evidence that has not been fully disclosed. The second is that, in the rush to get the vaccines to the masses, not enough testing was conducted to fully understand the potential risks and complications, as there would have been under normal, non-pandemic circumstances.
Malone states he doesn’t have every answer regarding the vaccine's safety, but he also states that neither does the government. He believes there are potentially serious risks to the vaccines and that they have not been adequately tested, despite the government’s claims to the contrary. Some of those risks include to pregnant or child-bearing women.
He also believes vaccines are, at best, a partial solution, but not the only solution, to the Covid problem. Malone argues that the essence of a good vaccination strategy is prevention and that vaccinating into a pandemic will ultimately not succeed.
In the case of the Covid pandemic, instead of stopping the spread, vaccines, he believes, are actually triggering more variants. Mutants such as the Delta variant, he says, are the direct result of the vaccines. He believes we are well past the point of using vaccines to turn the tide of the pandemic and so must seek alternative solutions.
Winning the War Against Therapeutic Nihilism & Trusted Treatments vs Untested Novel Therapies (Dr. Peter McCullough)
https://rumble.com/vn4iy9-dr.-peter-mccullough-md-covid-early-treatment-and-prevention-9242021.html
and
Webinar Wednesday | Dr. Peter McCullough
Highlights
“Fauci first took the world stage as the AIDS Czar in the 1980s, when he soon generated accusations of sacrificing the lives of AIDS patients to the interests of the pharmaceutical industry. In February 2021 PBS described Fauci’s handling of HIV this way: During the height of the HIV epidemic, LGBTQ activists pressed him to make experimental treatment drugs available for gay men dying of AIDS. They called on him to do something to stop the epidemic that was taking the lives of so many in their community. They protested outside his office at the NIAID, where he was the director with his head on a stake. They burned effigies of his body. In 1988, AIDS activists Larry Kramer famously addressed an open letter (see above) to Fauci in the San Francisco Examiner, accusing him of murder.
Under Fauci’s leadership, AZT, a very toxic, experimental drug, was approved for the treatment of AIDS under very chaotic conditions and remained controversial. Fauci was pushing AZT for expanded patient populations including as a preventative for asymptomatic patients thought to be infected based on controversial HIV testing. AZT was extremely expensive at $8,000 per patient per year (1988). Fauci has also pushed a very expensive COVID-19 drug remdesivir, which as also proved to be toxic to many.
Did Fauci also suppress less expensive and more effective treatments that were safer for AIDS? Yes! Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) cased by a fungus is not generally a threat to humans. However, from the beginning it became the most common opportunistic infection and the most common pneumonia in people living with HIV. It killed many people. The first choice for prevention and treatment among standard guides and many physicians were the sulfa drugs like Bactria which had a long history of being safe and effective. It had already been used for 20 years to treat the same opportunistic pneumonia in cancer patients. Bactria remains in widespread use today and is routinely prescribed for both approved and unapproved infections. Fauci opposed Bactria, while pushing expensive, highly toxic experimental drugs on the community who responded by accusing Fauci of murdering thousands of gay men. The story of Bactria sounds very similar to the story of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
Under the direction of Dr. Anthony Fauci 33 years ago patients were dying of pneumocystis pneumonia, which could be successfully treated with cheap, safe sulfa drugs. The activists pleaded with Dr. Fauci to issue guidance that suggested prophylactic treatment with Bactria. Dr. Fauci refused. Since the NIH refused to fund trials, activists raised the money themselves. By the time the results were ready two years later, 17,000 patients had died needlessly.” (Excerpt from COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We Are the Prey, Peter and Ginger Breggin, pages 250 - 253).
No comments:
Post a Comment