Total Pageviews
Wednesday, March 19, 2025
Monday, January 13, 2025
Friday, April 30, 2021
Bible in One Year Day 120 (2 Samuel 1, 1 Chronicles 1, Psalm 13)
You may subscribe yourself at the Ascension site here and receive notifications in your email, or just follow along on my blog. Bible in One Year Readings Index
Agape Bible Study
2 Samuel Chapter 1
There is probably no other man in Salvation History other than the "man who is God," Jesus of Nazareth, who had such an intensely personal relationship with Yahweh as the shepherd-warrior-king David of Bethlehem. It is true that Abraham and Moses both had unique relationships with Yahweh, but it is David who writes such profoundly beautiful and deeply spiritual poetry expressing his love and devotion to the God who called him both to suffering and greatness (see the Psalms attributed to David). David's name in Hebrew is dawid, which means "beloved." He may have had another Hebrew name, but he is called "David" from the moment of his anointing by the prophet Samuel (1 Sam 16:12-13), and he is known from that time forward as God's "beloved."
The author of the Book of Samuel is unknown, but as in the case of first part of this book known as 1 Samuel, some scholars have assigned authorship first to the prophet Samuel and after Samuel's death to David's prophet Nathan or possibly the prophet Gad (see 1 Chr 29:29). Some of the material from 2 Samuel seems to have come from a lost ancient book of poetry called the Book of Jasher or Yashar (Hebrew = seper hayyasar, "Book of the Upright or Just" or "Book of the Song." See references to this lost text in 2 Samuel 1:18; Joshua 10:13; and 1 Kings 8:12.
The second book of Samuel begins immediately after Saul's death when David becomes the king of Judah. The book can be divided into three parts. Part I covers chapters 1:1-11:1 and deals with David's triumphs in driving out the last of Israel's enemies and in consolidating his rule over the twelve tribes of Israel to become Israel's king with Jerusalem as his capital.
Part II, in chapters 11:2-20:26, deals with David's struggles and tragedies within his nation and within his family, including his sons' intrigues concerning the succession.
The third part is an appendix consisting of several stories from David's outlaw period to his years as Israel's king.
The book ends dramatically with David's offer of self-sacrifice to save his people from the wrath of God and with the building Yahweh's holy altar on the height of Mount Moriah in Jerusalem. The building of God's sacrificial altar on Mount Moriah is a prelude to the building of the Jerusalem Temple in 1 Kings by David's son and heir, Solomon. The main theme of the book is David as God's "messiah/anointed one" who is Yahweh's instrument in moving forth His plan for mankind's salvation. In this sense David is the precursor for his descendant, Jesus of Nazareth (Mt 1:1), for it is in David's role as God's anointed that the tradition of royal messianisam begins (see 2 Sam 7:10-17) and which will climax in Jesus' self-sacrifice on a lower elevation of Mount Moriah for the salvation of all humanity.
Chapter 1: The Death of Saul and the Defeat of Israel
At the end of the first book of Samuel, the Philistines were launching a campaign for control of northern Israel and the Israelites were preparing to meet the Philistines in battle in the Valley of Jezreel. David had been dismissed by his Philistine overlord, the king of Gath, and therefore David and his men made the three day journey back to their town of Ziklag in the Negeb of Judah (1 Sam 29). Upon arriving at Ziklag, they discovered that the undefended town had been burned to the ground in a raid by the Amalekites who had come up out of the southern Negeb. The Amalekites had captured their wives, children, and animals and had taken them south. David and his men immediately set out in pursuit of the Amalekites, caught up with them, and defeated them in battle. They recovered their wives and children, the captives from other towns in the Judean Negeb, and all the herds and flocks of animals (1 Sam 30).
In the meantime, the Philistines engaged the Israelite army of King Saul in battle at Mount Gilboa at the western end of the Jezreel Valley. Saul and three of his sons, including David's friend Jonathan, were killed on Mount Gilboa and the Israelites were defeated by the Philistines. The Philistines desecrated the bodies of Saul and his sons and hung them on the walls of the captured town of Beth-Shean.
2 Samuel 1:1-10 ~ David Learns of Saul's death
The second half of the Book of Samuel begins in the same way as the Book of Joshua and the Book of Judges by announcing the death of a major figure in salvation history. The Book of Joshua begins by announcing the death of Moses (Josh 1:1) and the Book of Judges begins by announcing the death of Joshua (Josh 1:1).
On the third day after David's victory over the Amalekites in 1 Samuel 31, a young man comes into David's camp with torn clothes and dirt on his head, the conventional signs of mourning (verse 2). The young man wants to make it clear that he regards Saul's death and Israel's defeat as a catastrophic event, but as we shall see he really sees the event as an opportunity.
Notice the mention of the "third day;" it is the fourth mention of "three days" since 1 Samuel 30:1, 12, 13. Three is always the symbolic number of some important event, especially an important event in God's divine plan. This is the inspired writer's way of telling us that all these events are directed by God's divine providence.
In verse four Davis says: "What has happened?" He uses the same identical Hebrew words as were spoken in 1 Samuel 4:16 by the priest Eli when he was brought the news of Israel's defeat by the Philistines and the death of his sons. There are several echoes of that scene in this part of the narrative. Notice that the phrase in the Hebrew text: "the youth who was telling him" is repeated three times in verses 5, 6 and 13.
The account of Saul's death in 2 Samuel does not agree with the account in 1 Samuel 31:3-7 where it was recorded that Saul fell on his sword, committing suicide. Although only the manner of Saul's death disagrees with the first account, the other details are in agreement. There are two different ways to explain the apparent discrepancy:
- The young man was lying about dispatching Saul at his request to curry favor with David and receive some kind of a reward. He simply came upon Saul's dead body lying on the battlefield.
- The young man came upon a dying Saul whose attempt to commit suicide had not been successful. In verse 10 the young man says that "he finished" and not that he killed Saul who was dying. It is possible that when Saul fell on his sword that his armor bearer only thought he was dead.
In verse 8 we learn that the young man is an Amalekite. That is significant because an Amalekite, even one who was a resident alien in Israel, would have no religious reasons to hinder him from doing violence to an Israelite king who is "Yahweh's anointed." Notice the young man never refers respectfully to Saul as Israel's "king."
Biblical scholar Robert Alter writes that the sentence construction and vocabulary suggest that Saul knows that he is dying. He writes that the Hebrew noun appears to be related to a root that suggests "confusion" or alternately "weakness," and the construction of the verbal stem suggests that Saul is asking the Amalekite not to kill him but to finish him off before the Philistines can get to him. He also points out that the Hebrew sentence seems to leave off as though the Amalekite was suggesting that Saul was too weak to continue speaking (Ancient Israel, page 426). Since the young man stood "over" Saul to "finish him" in verses 9 and 10 (the more accurate wording in the Hebrew text), Saul was probably on his knees and leaning on his upright spear. It is also unlikely that the young Amalekite came upon Saul as the battle was raging as he suggests in verse 6. It is more likely that he was a battlefield scavenger who happened upon Saul before the Philistines. The young man took Saul's crown and bracelet, signs of Saul's identity, to bring to David as proof that he killed Saul. He probably hoped to curry favor with David by telling him that he had killed David's enemy. Unfortunately, it does not turn out as the young Amalekite planned.
2 Samuel 1:11-16 ~ David's Reaction to the News of Saul's death
David displays the tradition expression of grief by tearing his clothing and his men follow his example. They also weep and fast until evening (the beginning of the next day was at sundown).
Question: For whom do they weep?
Answer: They weep:
- for Saul
- for Jonathan
- for the (covenant) people of Yahweh
- for the "House of Israel"
Question: What order does David give concerning the young Amalekite and why?
Answer: David orders his execution for taking the life of God's anointed.
1 Chronicles: Tells much the same history contained in 1and 2 Samuel, but from another point of view. It emphasizes the religious aspect of David's reign, notably his preparations for the building of the Temple.
CHALLENGE: “The early Christians did not take Jesus’ words ‘This is my body’ and ‘This is my blood literally.’ They saw them as symbols.”
DEFENSE:The record shows that the Church Fathers interpreted these passages literally.
On the Fathers of the first and second centuries, Protestant patristics expert J.N.D. Kelly writes: Ignatius roundly declares that . . . the bread is the flesh of Jesus, the cup his blood. Clearly he intends this realism to be taken strictly, for he makes it the basis of his argument against the Docetists’ denial of the reality of Christ’s body. . . . Irenaeus teaches that the bread and wine are really the Lord’s body and blood. His witness is, indeed, all the more impressive because he produces it quite incidentally while refuting the Gnostic and Docetic rejection of the Lord’s real humanity (Early Christian Doctrines,
197–198).
Concerning the Fathers of the third century, he writes: Hippolytus speaks of “the body and the blood” through which the Church is saved, and Tertullian regularly describes the bread as “the Lord’s body.” The converted pagan, he remarks, “feeds on the richness of the Lord’s body, that is, on the Eucharist.” The realism of his theology comes to light in the argument, based on the intimate relation of body and soul, that just as in baptism the body is washed with water so that the soul may be cleansed, so in the Eucharist “the flesh feeds upon Christ’s body and blood so that the soul may be filled with God.” Clearly his assumption is that the Savior’s body and blood are as real as the baptismal water.
Cyprian’s attitude is similar. Lapsed Christians who claim communion without doing penance, he declares, “do violence to his body and blood, a sin more heinous against the Lord with their hands and mouths than when they denied him.” Later he expatiates on the terrifying consequences of profaning the sacrament, and the stories he tells confirm that he took the Real Presence literally” (211–212).
Kelly concludes: Eucharistic teaching, it should be understood at the outset, was in general unquestioningly realist, i.e., the consecrated bread and wine were taken to be, and were treated and designated as, the Savior’s body and blood (440).
Jimmy Akin, A Daily Defense: 365 Days (Plus One) to Becoming a Better Apologist
Thursday, July 30, 2020
The Eucharist Through the Centuries: From the Council of Trent to Present Day
51. "Ambrose, the Bishop of Milan, in a clear statement on the Eucharistic conversion, has this to say: "Let us be assured that this is not what nature formed but what the blessing has consecrated; and there is greater power in the blessing and in nature, since nature itself is changed through the blessing." To confirm the truth of this mystery, he recounts many of the miracles described in the Sacred Scriptures, including Christ's birth of the Virgin Mary, and then he turns his mind to the work of creation, concluding this way: "Surely the word of Christ, who could make something that did not exist out of nothing, can change things that do exist into something they were not before. For it is no less extraordinary to give new natures to things than it is to change nature."
67. "No one can fail to see that the divine Eucharist bestows an incomparable dignity upon the Christian people. For it is not just while the Sacrifice is being offered and the Sacrament is being confected, but also after the Sacrifice has been offered and the Sacrament confected—while the Eucharist is reserved in churches or oratories—that Christ is truly Emmanuel, which means "God with us." For He is in the midst of us day and night; He dwells in us with the fullness of grace and of truth."
73. "May the all-merciful Redeemer, who shortly before His death prayed to the Father that all who were to believe in Him might be one, just as He and the Father are one, deign to hear this most ardent prayer of Ours and of the whole Church as quickly as possible, so that we may all celebrate the Eucharistic Mystery with one voice and one faith, and through sharing in the Body of Christ become one body, joined together by the same bonds that Christ wanted it to have."
5. "The Eucharist signifies this charity, and therefore recalls it, makes it present and at the same time brings it about. Every time that we consciously share in it, there opens in our souls a real dimension of that unfathomable love that includes everything that God has done and continues to do for us human beings, as Christ says: "My Father goes on working, and so do I."(John 5:17) Together with this unfathomable and free gift, which is charity revealed in its fullest degree in the saving sacrifice of the Son of God, the sacrifice of which the Eucharist is the indelible sign, there also springs up within us a lively response of love. We not only know love; we ourselves begin to love. We enter, so to speak, upon the path of love and along this path make progress. Thanks to the Eucharist, the love that springs up within us from the Eucharist develops in us, becomes deeper and grows stronger. Eucharistic worship is therefore precisely the expression of that love which is the authentic and deepest characteristic of the Christian vocation. This worship springs from the love and serves the love to which we are all called in Jesus Christ."
6. "The Eucharist educates us to this love in a deeper way; it shows us, in fact, what value each person, our brother or sister, has in God's eyes, if Christ offers Himself equally to each one, under the species of bread and wine. If our Eucharistic worship is authentic, it must make us grow in awareness of the dignity of each person. The awareness of that dignity becomes the deepest motive of our relationship with our neighbor."
8. "The priest offers the holy Sacrifice in persona Christi; this means more than offering "in the name of' or "in place of' Christ. In persona means in specific sacramental identification with "the eternal High Priest" who is the author and principal subject of this sacrifice of His, a sacrifice in which, in truth, nobody can take His place. Only He-only Christ-was able and is always able to be the true and effective "expiation for our sins and...for the sins of the whole world."(1 John 2:2) Only His sacrifice-and no one else's-was able and is able to have a "propitiatory power" before God, the Trinity, and the transcendent holiness. Awareness of this reality throws a certain light on the character and significance of the priest celebrant who, by confecting the holy Sacrifice and acting "in persona Christi," is sacramentally (and ineffably) brought into that most profound sacredness, and made part of it, spiritually linking with it in turn all those participating in the eucharistic assembly."
13. "Above all I wish to emphasize that the problems of the liturgy, and in particular of the Eucharistic Liturgy, must not be an occasion of dividing Catholics and for threatening the unity of the Church. This is demanded by an elementary understanding of that sacrament which Christ has left us as the source of spiritual unity. And how could the Eucharist, which in the Church is the sacramentum pietatis, signum unitatis, vinculum caritatis,(72) form between us at this time a point or division and a source of distortion of thought and of behavior, instead of being the focal point and constitutive center, which it truly is in its essence, of the unity of the Church herself?
We are all equally indebted to our Redeemer. We should all listen together to that spirit of truth and of love whom He has promised to the Church and who is operative in her. In the name of this truth and of this love, in the name of the crucified Christ and of His Mother, I ask you, and beg you: Let us abandon all opposition and division, and let us all unite in this great mission of salvation which is the price and at the same time the fruit of our redemption. The Apostolic See will continue to do all that is possible to provide the means of ensuring that unity of which we speak. Let everyone avoid anything in his own way of acting which could "grieve the Holy Spirit."
Catechism of the Catholic Church
Published 1992
1322: "The holy Eucharist completes Christian initiation. Those who have been raised to the dignity of the royal priesthood by Baptism and configured more deeply to Christ by Confirmation participate with the whole community in the Lord's own sacrifice by means of the Eucharist."
1323: "At the Last Supper, on the night he was betrayed, our Savior instituted the Eucharistic sacrifice of his Body and Blood. This he did in order to perpetuate the sacrifice of the cross throughout the ages until he should come again, and so to entrust to his beloved Spouse, the Church, a memorial of his death and resurrection: a sacrament of love, a sign of unity, a bond of charity, a Paschal banquet 'in which Christ is consumed, the mind is filled with grace, and a pledge of future glory is given to us.'"
1324: "The Eucharist is "the source and summit of the Christian life." "The other sacraments, and indeed all ecclesiastical ministries and works of the apostolate, are bound up with the Eucharist and are oriented toward it. For in the blessed Eucharist is contained the whole spiritual good of the Church, namely Christ himself, our Pasch."
1325: "The Eucharist is the efficacious sign and sublime cause of that communion in the divine life and that unity of the People of God by which the Church is kept in being. It is the culmination both of God's action sanctifying the world in Christ and of the worship men offer to Christ and through him to the Father in the Holy Spirit."
1326: "Finally, by the Eucharistic celebration we already unite ourselves with the heavenly liturgy and anticipate eternal life, when God will be all in all." (1 Col 15:28)
1327: "In brief, the Eucharist is the sum and summary of our faith: "Our way of thinking is attuned to the Eucharist, and the Eucharist in turn confirms our way of thinking."
1335: "The miracles of the multiplication of the loaves, when the Lord says the blessing, breaks and distributes the loaves through his disciples to feed the multitude, prefigures the superabundance of this unique bread."
1336: "The first announcement of the Eucharist divided the disciples, just as the announcement of the Passion scandalized them: 'This is a hard saying; who can listen to it?' The Eucharist and the Cross are stumbling blocks. It is the same mystery and it never ceases to be an occasion of division. 'Will you also go away?' The Lord's question echoes through the ages, as a loving invitation to discover that only he has 'the words of eternal life' and that to receive in faith the gift of the Eucharist is to receive the Lord himself."
1345: "As early as the second century we have the witness of St. Justin Martyr for the basic lines of the order of the Eucharistic celebration. They have stayed the same until our own day for all the great liturgical families. St. Justin wrote to the pagan emperor Antoninus Pius (138-161) around the year 155, explaining what Christians did:
- On the day we call the day of the sun, all who dwell in the city or country gather in the same place.
The memoirs of the apostles and the writings of the prophets are read, as much as time permits.
When the reader has finished, he who presides over those gathered admonishes and challenges them to imitate these beautiful things.
Then we all rise together and offer prayers* for ourselves . . .and for all others, wherever they may be, so that we may be found righteous by our life and actions, and faithful to the commandments, so as to obtain eternal salvation.
When the prayers are concluded we exchange the kiss.
Then someone brings bread and a cup of water and wine mixed together to him who presides over the brethren.
He takes them and offers praise and glory to the Father of the universe, through the name of the Son and of the Holy Spirit and for a considerable time he gives thanks (in Greek: eucharistian) that we have been judged worthy of these gifts.
When he has concluded the prayers and thanksgivings, all present give voice to an acclamation by saying: 'Amen.'
When he who presides has given thanks and the people have responded, those whom we call deacons give to those present the "eucharisted" bread, wine and water and take them to those who are absent."
1346: "The liturgy of the Eucharist unfolds according to a fundamental structure which has been preserved throughout the centuries down to our own day. It displays two great parts that form a fundamental unity:
- the gathering, the liturgy of the Word, with readings, homily and general intercessions;
- the liturgy of the Eucharist, with the presentation of the bread and wine, the consecratory thanksgiving, and communion.
The liturgy of the Word and liturgy of the Eucharist together form "one single act of worship"; the Eucharistic table set for us is the table both of the Word of God and of the Body of the Lord."
1347 "Is this not the same movement as the Paschal meal of the risen Jesus with his disciples? Walking with them he explained the Scriptures to them; sitting with them at table "he took bread, blessed and broke it, and gave it to them."
1356 "If from the beginning Christians have celebrated the Eucharist and in a form whose substance has not changed despite the great diversity of times and liturgies, it is because we know ourselves to be bound by the command the Lord gave on the eve of his Passion: "Do this in remembrance of me."
1367 "The sacrifice of Christ and the sacrifice of the Eucharist are one single sacrifice: "The victim is one and the same the same now offers through the ministry of priests, who then offered himself on the cross; only the manner of offering is different. And since in this divine sacrifice which is celebrated in the Mass, the same Christ who offered himself once in a bloody manner on the altar of the cross is contained and is offered in an unbloody manner."
1382 "To receive communion is to receive Christ himself who has offered himself for us."
1406 "Jesus said: I am the living bread that came down from heaven; if anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever;...he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life and...abides in me, and I in him." (John 6:51, 54,56)
1407 "The Eucharist is the heart and the summit of the Church's life, for in it Christ associates his Church and all her members with his sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving offered once for all on the cross to his Father; by this sacrifice he pours out the graces of salvation on his Body which is the Church."
1411 "Only validly ordained priests can preside at the Eucharist and consecrate the bread and wine so that they become the Body and Blood of the Lord."
1412 "The essential signs of the Eucharistic sacrament are wheat bread and grape wine, on which the blessing of the Holy Spirit is invoked and the priest pronounces the words of consecration spoken by Jesus during the Last Supper: "This is my body which will be given up for you. . . . This is the cup of my blood. . . ."
1413 "By the consecration the transubstantiation of the bread and wine into the Body and Blood of Christ is brought about. Under the consecrated species of bread and wine Christ himself, living and glorious, is present in a true, real, and substantial manner: his Body and his Blood, with his soul and his divinity."
1414 "As sacrifice, the Eucharist is also offered in reparation for the sins of the living and the dead and to obtain spiritual or temporal benefits from God."
Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament,
I believe in You, I hope in You, I love You.
Maranatha! Come, Lord Jesus. (Rev 1:4; 22:20)
Wednesday, July 8, 2020
The Eucharist Through the Centuries: The Sixth through the Thirteenth Century
Sunday, June 21, 2020
The Eucharist Through the Centuries: The Fifth Century
St. Augustine
"The main purpose of this work is to trace elements of Eucharistic doctrine from the day our Lord Jesus Christ announced it for the first time in the synagogue in Capernaum (John, Chapter 6) down to our day." Rev. Roberto de la Vega, Archdiocese of Santa Fe, Eucharist Through The Centuries.
St. Jerome was born in Dalmatia in what is now Bosnia. He served for awhile as secretary to Pope Damasus, who asked St. Jerome to translate the books of the Bible from their original Hebrew and Greek into Latin. His version would be called the Vulgate. Here are some of St. Jerome's writings:
"Ignorance of the Scriptures, is ignorance of Christ."
"Christ is present in his word, since it is he himself who speaks when the Scriptures are read in the Church."
"Since the flesh of the Lord is real food, and his blood real drink, spiritually speaking, we have in this present life only one good thing, namely, to eat his flesh and drink his blood not only in the Eucharist, but also in the reading of the Scriptures. For the knowledge of the Scriptures is true food and drink taken from God's word."
"The Savior of the human race celebrated the Pasch in an upper room...he (Christ) entrusted the mystery of the body and blood to his disciples, and left us the eternal feast of the spotless Lamb."
"That which is written in the Gospel of Matthew (6:11) according to the Latin interpreter is 'Give us this day our daily bread.' But it is better in Greek: 'our supersubstantial bread'; that is, the principal, special or singular bread."
St. Augustine was born in Tagaste in what is now part of Algiers to a pagan father. His mother was St. Monica. St. Augustine lead an immoral life until finally his mother was able to get him to meet with St. Ambrose. St. Augustine in his search for the truth read st. Paul's Letter to the Romans, "Let us live decently, as people do in daytime: no drunken orgies, no promiscuity, no licentiousness, no wrangling..." St. Augustine wrote, "I had neither desire nor need to read further. The miracle of grace was worked in calm and silence." St. Augustine was baptized by St. Ambrose. Here are some of St. Augustine's writings:
"Thou hast made us for thyself, O Lord, and our hearts are restless until they rest in thee."
"It has pleased the Holy Spirit that, in honor of so great a sacrament, the body of Christ enter the mouth of a Christian before other foods."
"Therefore, newly baptized, take and eat the body of Christ, now that you have become members of Christ in the body of Christ (the Church). Take and drink the blood of Christ. Do not become separated; eat the bond that unites you."
"Four things are to be considered in every sacrifice: to whom it is offered; by whom it is offered; what is offered; and for whom it is offered. Christ himself is the one true mediator, who reconciles us to God through his sacrifice of peace. He remains one with him (God the Father) to whom the sacrifice is offered. He remains united with those for whom the sacrifice is offered (the Church, the mystical body of Christ). He himself is the one who offers the sacrifice; and he himself is what is offered."
"Christ spoke in a demonstrative way, 'This is my body and this is my blood,' so that you do not think that the things that you see are a figure or type; but the offerings are really transformed into the body and blood of Christ through the ineffable action of God the Almighty. When we partake of the body and blood of Christ, we receive his life-giving and sanctifying strength. It is property that Christ, through the Holy Spirit, penetrate into us in a manner worthy of God with his holy flesh and precious blood in our bodies. We have the flesh and body of Christ in the form of bread and wine as a life-giving blessing, so that we do not remain unmoved when we see his flesh and blood exposed on the sacred altars of the churches."